This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
ions were used to neutralize the excess electrical charge of the droplets, respectively. The affinity of the mineral surface to the oil models was estimated by the contact angle for systems where it was possible. However, for systems where the droplets did not adhere to the mineral, a methodology based on the height of the droplet on the surface was proposed. The results showed that, in general, for the inverse emulsions, water exhibited a high affinity for both illite surfaces, with its contact angle remaining below 45° regardless of pH. However, the heptane/heptanoic acid inverse emulsions on the edge surface were an exception to this behavior. Specifically, the contact angles calculated for the water droplets revealed mixed wettability due to hydrogen bonds between the carboxylic functional groups (pH ≪ 4.4) and the surface silanols and aluminols. Oil droplets suspended in water, on the other hand, did not adhere to the illite surfaces, and contact angles were not measurable. Nevertheless, the heptane/heptanoic acid droplets (pH ≪ 4.4) showed heights of approximately 2 Å and 4 Å above the basal and edge surfaces, respectively. This behavior was attributed to the hydrogen bonds formed between the carboxylic functional groups and the water molecules located on the mineral surfaces. Finally, the heptane/heptanoate (pH ≫ 4.4) and heptane/hexylammonium (pH ≪ 10.64) droplets were localized at distances greater than 8 Å from the surface, presumably due to a charge repulsion between the mineral surface and the surface of the droplets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arboleda-Lamus et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: