Why the study?
The metabolic failure of macrophages to adequately process lipid is central to atherosclerosis aetiology, prompting investigation into the role of macrophage ACE.
Does increased macrophage ACE expression reduce atherosclerosis in a PCSK9-induced mouse model?
Does increased macrophage ACE expression reduce atherosclerosis in a PCSK9-induced mouse model?
Increased macrophage ACE expression reduces atherosclerosis by enhancing lipid metabolism, which may have implications for choosing between ARBs and ACE inhibitors.
Should not change ACE inhibitor or ARB use; leaves open macrophage ACE effects in human atherosclerosis.
AIMS: The metabolic failure of macrophages to adequately process lipid is central to the aetiology of atherosclerosis. Here, we examine the role of macrophage angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in a mouse model of PCSK9-induced atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atherosclerosis in mice was induced with AAV-PCSK9 and a high-fat diet. Animals with increased macrophage ACE (ACE 10/10 mice) have a marked reduction in atherosclerosis vs. WT mice. Macrophages from both the aorta and peritoneum of ACE 10/10 express increased PPARα and have a profoundly altered phenotype to process lipids characterized by higher levels of the surface scavenger receptor CD36, increased uptake of lipid, increased capacity to transport long chain fatty acids into mitochondria, higher oxidative metabolism and lipid β-oxidation as determined using 13C isotope tracing, increased cell ATP, increased capacity for efferocytosis, increased concentrations of the lipid transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1, and increased cholesterol efflux. These effects are mostly independent of angiotensin II. Human THP-1 cells, when modified to express more ACE, increase expression of PPARα, increase cell ATP and acetyl-CoA, and increase cell efferocytosis. CONCLUSION: Increased macrophage ACE expression enhances macrophage lipid metabolism, cholesterol efflux, efferocytosis, and it reduces atherosclerosis. This has implications for the treatment of cardiovascular disease with angiotensin II receptor antagonists vs. ACE inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: