Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trabecular bone score (TBS) Z scores in long-distance runners with bone stress injuries (BSIs) in whom the bone mineral density (BMD) Z score is more than -1.0 (Aim 1) and whether the number of runners with abnormal TBS Z scores would be higher in those with BSI in trabecular-rich sites as compared with cortical-rich sites (Aim 2). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Institutional sports medicine center. PATIENTS: We analyzed Z scores derived from the TBS and BMD in 44 long-distance runners aged 18 to 40 years who had sustained BSIs between 2017 and 2023 and undergone a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan with reported TBS measurements within 1 year before or 2 years after their injuries. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Bone mineral density and TBS Z scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of BMD and TBS Z scores in long-distance runners with BSIs, further stratified according to cortical-rich and trabecular-rich BSIs. RESULTS: Bone mineral density assessments revealed an average Z score of -0.96 ± 0.99. In this cohort of 44 runners, 55% (n = 24) of runners were reported to have BMD Z score more than -1.0. Within this subgroup, 54% (n = 13) displayed abnormal TBS. Stratifying BSIs by trabecular- (n = 23) and cortical-rich (n = 19) sites, we found no significant difference in sex, mean BMD, or the number of runners with abnormal TBS between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular bone score Z scores in sports medicine may provide complementary information to BMD in long-distance runners with BSI, particularly when the BMD Z scores are more than -1.0. However, further research is needed to validate the usefulness of TBS Z scores in this context. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Case Series, IV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: