Why the study?
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation is an effective alternative to center-based rehabilitation, but studies focusing on its long-term effects remain limited.
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness at 1 year in patients with coronary artery disease compared to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness at 1 year in patients with coronary artery disease compared to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation using wrist heart rate monitors provides superior long-term cardiorespiratory fitness benefits compared to traditional center-based rehabilitation in CAD patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports home-based telerehabilitation for CAD; extends RCT evidence of sustained fitness gains to 1 year.
BACKGROUND: Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation (HBCT) is a feasible and effective alternative to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR). Currently, there are only limited studies focusing on a long-term effect of HBCT, which means it is essential to do more research in this study field. AIM: This study aimed at investigating a 1-year effect of a randomized controlled study using Cardiac Rehabilitation through the Global Position System (CR-GPS) compared to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Study focused on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with coronary heart disease (CAD). DESIGN: A long-term follow-up of a randomized study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled, and the intervention was performed in an outpatient or home-based model. The results were obtained and evaluated in a hospital. POPULATION: Patients who participated in the CR-GPS study were diagnosed with CAD with low to moderate cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study were eligible participants who had previously completed a 12-week HBCT program using a wrist heart rate (HR) monitor or attended a traditional CBCR. Primary outcome was the change in CRF expressed in peak oxygen uptake (pVO<inf>2</inf>), and the secondary outcomes were self-reported HRQL, objectively measured anthropometric characteristics, and mortality and hospitalization rates. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (76%) completed the long-term follow-up. The average peak of pVO<inf>2</inf> was higher after 1-year follow-up in the telerehabilitation group (HBCT 25.5 mL/kg/min compared to the active control group CBCR 23.6 mL/kg/min P=0.047). No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found after long-term follow-up for the parameter HRQL. For both groups, there was a significant improvement in the range of perceptions of general health. There was no death case and no difference in hospitalization rate between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the HBCT model. It has been demonstrated that it induces satisfactory long-term effects in pVO<inf>2</inf>, exercise performance, and perceived general health in CAD patients with low to moderate cardiovascular risk. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Cardiovascular telerehabilitation using wrist HR monitors is a feasible and effective rehabilitation method that can help patients eliminate barriers that prevent them from using CBCR programs. Especially in the current global situation with the COVID-19 pandemic, this topic is becoming increasingly important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baťalík et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: