Why the study?
Does the proximal femoral nail improve restoration of walking ability in patients with pertrochanteric femoral fractures compared to the dynamic hip screw?
Does the proximal femoral nail improve restoration of walking ability in patients with pertrochanteric femoral fractures compared to the dynamic hip screw?
The proximal femoral nail may allow faster post-operative restoration of walking ability compared to the dynamic hip screw in patients with pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proximal femoral nail may improve early walking recovery versus dynamic hip screw in pertrochanteric fractures; extends evidence for intramedullary fixation.
We treated 108 patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture using either the dynamic hip screw or the proximal femoral nail in this prospective, randomised series. We compared walking ability before fracture, intra-operative variables and return to their residence. Patients treated with the proximal femoral nail (n = 42) had regained their pre-operative walking ability significantly (p = 0.04) more often by the four-month review than those treated with the dynamic hip screw (n = 41). Peri-operative or immediate post-operative measures of outcome did not differ between the groups, with the exception of operation time. The dynamic hip screw allowed a significantly greater compression of the fracture during the four-month follow-up, but consolidation of the fracture was comparable between the two groups. Two major losses of reduction were observed in each group, resulting in a total of four revision operations. Our results suggest that the use of the proximal femoral nail may allow a faster post-operative restoration of walking ability, when compared with the dynamic hip screw.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pajarinen et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: