Why the study?
Gastroenterologists frequently need to manage direct oral anticoagulants around the time of endoscopy, but most prior studies focused primarily on the risk of spontaneous bleeding.
How should direct oral anticoagulants be managed in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures to balance bleeding and thrombotic risks?
How should direct oral anticoagulants be managed in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures to balance bleeding and thrombotic risks?
Endoscopic procedures in DOAC users require a detailed analysis of the risks of secondary bleeding and thrombosis, guided by current gastroenterology guidelines.
Supports individualized DOAC management decisions for endoscopy; leaves optimal periprocedural strategies open pending higher-level evidence.
The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and prevention of strokes is encouraged by their superior properties compared to vitamin K antagonists: predictable anticoagulant effect, greater patient compliance, few drug interactions, low risk of intracranial hemorrhages. Although practicing gastroenterologists may never prescribe a DOAC, they are likely to encounter DOAC-related GI adverse events (gastrointestinal bleeding), and they will need to manage DOACs around the time of endoscopy. The present paper aims to present the management possibilities of the patient treated with DOAC undergoing endoscopy, most studies performed so far focusing on the risk of spontaneous bleeding in this category of subjects. The current guidelines provided by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy orientate us, but endoscopic maneuvers should be preceded by a detailed analysis of the risks of secondary bleeding and thrombosis associated with DOAC users.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ionescu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: