Why the study?
Do NOACs reduce thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death compared to warfarin or no anticoagulation in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Do NOACs reduce thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death compared to warfarin or no anticoagulation in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In a Japanese registry of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, NOACs were associated with significantly lower rates of thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death over 5 years compared to no anticoagulation.
BACKGROUND: The J-RHYTHM Registry 2 was a multicenter, prospective observational study that extended the follow-up period of the J-RHYTHM Registry in order to investigate long-term outcomes and effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 6,616 patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) (men 71.0%, 69.7±9.9 years, CHADS2score 1.7±1.2), event rates were compared among patients receiving warfarin (n=3,964), NOACs (n=923), and no anticoagulation therapy (No-OAC, n=753) at the end of follow-up, except for 976 patients lacking anticoagulant data. During the 5-year follow-up period, thromboembolism occurred in 196 (4.9%), 19 (2.1%), and 45 (6.0%) patients, respectively; major hemorrhage in 233 (5.9%), 22 (2.4%), and 36 (4.8%); all-cause death in 230 (5.8%), 13 (1.4%), and 105 (13.9%), (P<0.001 for each). After adjusting for the components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score and antiplatelet drug use, the odds ratio (OR) in the Warfarin group was significantly lower for all-cause death compared with that in the No-OAC group (OR 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.39, P<0.001), whereas ORs in the NOACs group were significantly lower for all events (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.74, P=0.003 for thromboembolism; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.93, P=0.027 for major hemorrhage; and OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.18, P<0.001 for all-cause death, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NOACs could be beneficial for reducing event rates of all types in Japanese NVAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kodani et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: