Why the study?
Does concurrent measurement of uterine perfusion and heart rate/blood pressure variability improve the prediction of pre-eclampsia in second-trimester pregnancies?
Does concurrent measurement of uterine perfusion and heart rate/blood pressure variability improve the prediction of pre-eclampsia in second-trimester pregnancies?
Combining uterine artery Doppler with heart rate and blood pressure variability parameters in the second trimester improves the positive predictive accuracy for pre-eclampsia.
May improve second-trimester pre-eclampsia prediction; leaves open whether this approach alters outcomes pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Pre-eclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy with high morbidity and mortality and an incidence of 3-5% in all pregnancies. Early prediction is still insufficient in clinical practice. Although most pre-eclamptic patients have pathological uterine perfusion in the second trimester, perfusion disturbance has a positive predictive accuracy (PPA) only of approximately 30%. METHODS: Non-invasive continuous blood pressure recordings were taken simultaneously via a finger cuff for 30 min. Time series of systolic as well as diastolic beat-to-beat pressure values were extracted to analyse heart rate and blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity in 102 second-trimester pregnancies, to assess predictability for pre-eclampsia (n = 16). All women underwent Doppler investigations of the uterine arteries. RESULTS: We identified a combination of three variability and baroreflex parameters to best predict pre-eclampsia several weeks before clinical manifestation. The discriminant function of these three parameters classified patients with later pre-eclampsia with a sensitivity of 87.5%, a specificity of 83.7%, and a PPA of 50.0%. Combined with Doppler investigations of uterine arteries, PPA increased to 71.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of incorporating one-stop clinical assessment of uterine perfusion and variability parameters in the second trimester produces the most effective prediction of pre-eclampsia to date.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walther et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: