Why the study?
Does a radar-based noncontact system using LFMCW radar and a modified ResNet-18 network accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure in human subjects?
Does a radar-based noncontact system using LFMCW radar and a modified ResNet-18 network accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure in human subjects?
A novel LFMCW radar-based noncontact system using a modified ResNet-18 network can estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure with low mean absolute errors, offering potential for cuffless dynamic BP tracking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noncontact BP monitoring development; leaves open prospective validation in clinical cohorts before adoption.
In this article, a radar-based noncontact blood pressure (BP) monitoring system has been proposed for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimation. A linear frequency-modulated continuous wave (LFMCW) radar sensor has been utilized to capture the carotid pulse wave signal contactlessly. After that, a modified residual neural network model based on the ResNet-18 architecture was constructed to estimate the BP values based on the radar-acquired carotid pulse wave signal. The experimental database with 100 human subjects has been collected in a laboratory environment. The record-wise mean absolute errors (MAEs) of SBP and DBP estimations are 3.51 and 2.44 mmHg, respectively. Regarding the standard deviation (STD), the error performance of SBP and DBP estimations are 6.90 and 4.61 mmHg, respectively. Furthermore, the subject-wise MAEs of SBP and DBP achieve 5.92 and 4.32 mmHg, respectively. The proposed method can be a good extension for cuffless BP measurement and potentially be applied in many scenarios that require dynamic BP tracking, such as sleep or perioperative periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: