Why the study?
Infectious complications remain a major clinical problem after colorectal surgery, and the diagnostic value of presepsin for their early detection compared with CRP and PCT needed assessment.
Does presepsin monitoring improve the early detection of infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery compared with CRP and PCT?
Does presepsin monitoring improve the early detection of infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery compared with CRP and PCT?
Presepsin shows distinct postoperative trends compared to CRP and PCT and may be a useful biomarker for detecting infectious complications after colorectal surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Presepsin shows good predictability for post-colorectal surgery infections on POD 6; leaves open whether it improves early detection versus CRP in prospective studies.
Background: Infectious complications remain a major clinical problem in colorectal surgery, contributing to prolonged hospital stays, additional costs and significant postoperative mortality. Presepsin has been reported to be a useful marker to diagnose sepsis, similar or superior to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma presepsin concentrations are associated with the severity of sepsis and its outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of presepsin in the early detection of infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery, compared with CRP and PCT. Methods: This study was a prospective observational study. Patients of age >18 who underwent elective colon resections were enrolled and patients with end-stage kidney disease were excluded. Blood samples were collected just before surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. Infectious complications were diagnosed by surgeons. Results: A total of 114 patients were examined, and 27 patients (23.7%) developed infectious complications: 11 anastomotic leaks, 13 intra-abdominal infections, and 3 wound infections. CRP and PCT markedly increased from POD1 to POD3 and then gradually decreased toward POD6 in both groups, but the trends of the decrease in the infected group were blunt, compared with those in the non-infected group. On the other hand, presepsin did not show major changes just after surgery, but it increased on POD4 and POD6, when the complications occurred. ROC analysis to predict infectious complications revealed that the best accuracy was obtained on POD 6 for all biomarkers. CRP showed excellent predictability and presepsin showed good predictability. However, the cut-off values of all biomarkers were relatively lower than expected. Conclusions: The trends of change in presepsin following colorectal surgeries were distinct from those of CRP and PCT. Monitoring the presepsin trends after colorectal surgeries could be helpful to detect postoperative infectious complications. Trial registration: UMIN000025313. Registered on 17 December 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amanai et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: