Why the study?
Does nifedipine coat-core 30 mg once daily reduce 24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure comparably to amlodipine 5 mg once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension?
Does nifedipine coat-core 30 mg once daily reduce 24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure comparably to amlodipine 5 mg once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension?
Nifedipine coat-core 30 mg once daily provides comparable reductions in 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure to amlodipine 5 mg once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
Supports nifedipine coat-core as once-daily alternative to amlodipine; confirms comparable ambulatory BP efficacy in RCT.
BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers have been successfully used for the treatment of hypertension. In this study, the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers nifedipine coat-core 30 mg and amlodipine 5 mg were evaluated. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, parallel-arm study compared once daily administration of nifedipine coat-core 30 mg with once daily amlodipine 5 mg in subjects with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week placebo run-in period was followed by an 8-week active treatment period. Blood pressure reduction was measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and casual office blood pressure measured by mercury sphygmomanometer. RESULTS: Nifedipine coat-core and amlodipine produced equivalent reductions in mean diastolic blood pressure, as determined by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure was 5.4 mmHg and 5.8 mmHg for nifedipine coat-core and amlodipine, respectively. Both drugs were well tolerated and neither treatment resulted in a significant change in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine coat-core 30 mg once-daily is comparable to amlodipine 5 mg once-daily for blood pressure reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byyny et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: