Key result
An age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram reached target INR faster than physician-determined dosing in acute ischaemic stroke patients (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.26-2.45; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does an age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram reduce the time to therapeutic INR and risk of excessive anticoagulation in acute ischaemic stroke patients compared to physician-determined dosing?
Cohort (n=200)
Does an age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram reduce the time to therapeutic INR and risk of excessive anticoagulation in acute ischaemic stroke patients compared to physician-determined dosing?
An age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram significantly reduces the time to target INR and the risk of excessive anticoagulation in acute ischemic stroke patients compared to physician-determined dosing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May accelerate time to therapeutic INR in acute ischaemic stroke; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVES: Specific guidelines for initial dosing of warfarin in ischaemic stroke patients have not been developed. Therefore, we have developed an age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram (AW-WIN) for ischaemic stroke patients and then evaluated the efficacy and safety of AW-WIN compared with physician-determined warfarin dosing (PDWD). METHODS: The age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram was administered to 104 acute ischaemic stroke patients between January 2008 and February 2009. A historical control group (PDWD) of 96 patients was selected from comparable patients who were discharged with warfarin during the previous year. Time-to-therapeutic international normalized ratios (INRs) and the incidence of excessive anticoagulation were compared in the AW-WIN and PDWD groups. RESULTS: The general characteristics, risk factors, and stroke mechanism of the AW-WIN and PDWD groups did not differ significantly. The mean time to INR ≥ 2.0 was significantly shorter in the AW-WIN than in the PDWD group (4.9 ± 0.7 vs. 6.2 ± 0.8 days, P = 0.0008). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, the AW-WIN group reached target INR faster than the PDWD group (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.45; P = 0.001). The time-to-therapeutic INR ≥1.7 was shorter (P = 0.0002), the proportion of patients with therapeutic INR (2-3) at 5 days was higher (P = 0.002), and the rate of excessive anticoagulation of ≥3.5 INR during hospitalization was lower (P = 0.024) in the AW-WIN than in the PDWD group. CONCLUSIONS: AW-WIN reduces the time to target INR and the risk of excessive anticoagulation. AW-WIN may be an efficient and safe method of anticoagulation during the acute phase of ischaemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Acute ischaemic stroke (n=200). Age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram (AW-WIN) vs. Physician-determined warfarin dosing (PDWD) was evaluated on Time to INR ≥ 2.0 (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.45, p=0.001). An age- and weight-adjusted warfarin initiation nomogram reached target INR faster than physician-determined dosing in acute ischaemic stroke patients (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.26-2.45; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: