Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes, poor glycemic control was associated with a significantly lower Ankle Brachial Index compared to good glycemic control, though there was no significant direct correlation between glycemic status and total antioxidant status.
Why the study?
Does poor glycemic control worsen subclinical atherosclerosis and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=267)
No
Does poor glycemic control worsen subclinical atherosclerosis and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.11% vs 1.16%
p-value: p=0.03
In patients with type 2 diabetes, poor glycemic control is associated with worse subclinical atherosclerosis (CIMT) with increasing age and diabetes duration, though it is not significantly correlated with total antioxidant status.
Supports ABI monitoring in poorly controlled T2D; leaves open glycemic effects on oxidative stress.
INTRODUCTION: By rising diabetes mellitus prevalence, the prevalence of its most complication; cardiovascular disease (CVD) is also increasing. Moreover, oxidative stress has important role in pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. We investigated relationship between total antioxidant status (TAS) and surrogate measures of subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) with glycemic status in diabetics. METHODS & MATERIALS: In a cross-sectional study, we recorded height, weight, waist circumference (WC) and blood pressure of 267 subjects. Blood samples were collected to measure fasting blood sugar (FBS), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profiles and TAS. The surrogate measures of SA were Carotid Intima Media Thickness (CIMT), and Ankle Brachial Index (ABI). RESULTS: We found significantly lower TAS leves and ABI values and higher CIMT in diabetic patients especially in poor glycemic group. There was a nonsignificant, weak correlation between TAS, ABI and CIMT with glycemic status (r = -0.10, -0.16, and +0.09, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed a significant influence of increasing age and diabetes duration on worsening CIMT in poor glycemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed poor glycemic control leads to worse CIMT by increasing age and duration of diabetes. However we did not find a significan correlation between glycemic status and TAS levels. We suggest CIMT measurement along with other SA markers in poor glycemic diabetics, especially in older patients with longer duration of diabetes, to identify high risk CVD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabatabaei‐Malazy et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=267). Poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.5%) vs. Good glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7.5%) was evaluated on Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) (p=0.03). In patients with type 2 diabetes, poor glycemic control was associated with a significantly lower Ankle Brachial Index compared to good glycemic control, though there was no significant direct correlation between glycemic status and total antioxidant status.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: