Key result
Well-controlled diabetes is linked to greater 5-year progression of hsTnT compared to normoglycemia.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease risk remains elevated in individuals with diabetes even with good glycemic control, and the role of cardiac biomarkers in capturing subclinical cardiac stress and injury in this population is not well understood.
Does glycemic control status predict longitudinal changes in cardiovascular disease risk biomarkers in people with metabolic syndrome?
Observational (n=562)
Yes
Does glycemic control status predict longitudinal changes in cardiovascular disease risk biomarkers in people with metabolic syndrome?
Effect estimate: β = 0.10 (95% CI 0.02, 0.19)
Even with adequate glycemic control, individuals with diabetes and metabolic syndrome experience progressive subclinical cardiac damage and fibrosis over 5 years compared to normoglycemic individuals.
Even well-controlled diabetes was associated with greater hsTnT progression; hypothesis-generating for whether intensified monitoring or therapies are needed in metabolic syndrome.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals with diabetes, where risk remains elevated even with good glycemic control. Cardiac biomarkers such as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), high sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hsCRP), Procollagen Type I Carboxy-Terminal Propeptide (PICP), and 3-Nytrotirosine (3-NT) may capture subclinical cardiac stress and injury beyond traditional risk measures. Methods: We analyzed 562 participants from the PREDIMED-Plus trial with data on diabetes status, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and cardiovascular biomarkers. At baseline, participants were categorized as having normoglycemia (HbA1c <5.7%; n=50), prediabetes (HbA1c ≥5.7 to <6.5%; n=353), diabetes with well-controlled glycemia (HbA1c <7%; n=127), or diabetes with poorly controlled glycemia (HbA1c ≥7%; n=32). Cardiac biomarkers assessed at baseline, 3 years, and 5 years included NT-proBNP, hsTnT, hsCRP, PICP, and 3-NT. Mixed models, adjusted for demographic, clinical, and lifestyle covariates, were used to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Results: Cross-sectionally, higher HbA1c was inversely associated with NT-proBNP (β = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.29, -0.04) and directly associated with hsTnT (β = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.14), particularly among those with poorly controlled diabetes. No consistent associations were observed for hsCRP, PICP, or 3-NT. Longitudinally, baseline differences in diabetes status were not significantly related to biomarker changes. However, compared to normoglycemic participants, those with well-controlled diabetes showed higher increases in hsTnT (β = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.19) and PICP (β = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.28). Conclusion: Even with adequate glycemic control, individuals with diabetes may experience progression of subclinical cardiac damage and fibrosis. Incorporating cardiac biomarkers into risk assessment may improve early identification of CVD risk in high-risk populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Casanova et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Metabolic syndrome (n=562). Well-controlled diabetes vs. Normoglycemia was evaluated on 5-year change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) (β = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02, 0.19). Participants with well-controlled diabetes experienced significantly greater progression of subclinical cardiovascular damage, demonstrating higher 5-year increases in hsTnT (β = 0.10) compared to normoglycemic individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: