Key result
Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction at peak dobutamine stress by a mean of 8.7% compared to control in insulin-resistant subjects with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp improve ischemic left ventricular function during dobutamine stress echocardiography in subjects with coronary artery disease and insulin resistance?
RCT (n=24)
Single-blind
Randomized crossover
No
Does a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp improve ischemic left ventricular function during dobutamine stress echocardiography in subjects with coronary artery disease and insulin resistance?
Mean Difference: 8.7 (95% CI 5.8–11.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 73.5% vs 64.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Metabolic manipulation with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp improves ischemic left ventricular function during dobutamine stress in patients with coronary artery disease, with the greatest benefit seen in insulin-resistant subjects.
Supports metabolic support during stress testing in insulin-resistant CAD; extends RCT evidence for acute insulin effects on ischemic LV function.
BACKGROUND: Glucose is a more efficient substrate for ATP production than free fatty acid (FFA). Insulin resistance (IR) results in higher FFA concentrations and impaired myocardial glucose use, potentially worsening ischemia. We hypothesized that metabolic manipulation with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) would affect a greater improvement in left ventricular (LV) performance during dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in subjects with IR. METHODS: 24 subjects with normal LV function and coronary disease (CAD) awaiting revascularization underwent 2 DSEs. Prior to one DSEs they underwent an HEC, where a primed infusion of insulin (rate 43 mU/m 2/min) was co-administered with 20% dextrose at variable rates to maintain euglycemia. At steady-state the DSE was performed and images of the LV were acquired with tissue Doppler at each stage for offline analysis. Segmental peak systolic velocities (Vs) were recorded, as well as LV ejection fraction (EF). Subjects were then divided into two groups based on their insulin sensitivity during the HEC. RESULTS: HEC changed the metabolic environment, suppressing FFAs and thereby increasing glucose use. This resulted in improved LV performance at peak stress, measured by EF (IS group mean difference 5.3 (95% CI 2.5-8) %, p = 0.002; IR group mean difference 8.7 (95% CI 5.8-11.6) %, p < 0.0001) and peak V s in ischemic segments (IS group mean improvement 0.7(95% CI 0.07-1.58) cm/s, p = 0.07; IR group mean improvement 1.0 (95% CI 0.54-1.5) cm/s, p < 0.0001) , that was greater in the subjects with IR. CONCLUSIONS: Increased myocardial glucose use induced by HEC improves LV function under stress in subjects with CAD and IR. Cardiac metabolic manipulation in subjects with IR is a promising target for future therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heck et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease with normal left ventricular function (n=24). Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp vs. Unclamped dobutamine stress echocardiogram was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction at peak dobutamine stress in insulin resistant subjects (MD 8.7%, 95% CI 5.8-11.6, p=<0.0001). Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction at peak dobutamine stress by a mean of 8.7% compared to control in insulin-resistant subjects with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: