Key result
The use of the Orsiro ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent significantly reduced the risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI (HR 0.75) compared to other newer-generation drug-eluting stents at two years.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the real-world clinical performance of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro) in a large nationwide cohort of patients undergoing PCI.
Does a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES improve clinical outcomes compared to other newer-generation DES in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=74,131)
Yes
Does a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES improve clinical outcomes compared to other newer-generation DES in patients undergoing PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.75 (95% CI 0.6–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 2.3%
p-value: p=0.013
In a nationwide real-world registry, the use of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent was associated with a lower risk of target lesion revascularization compared to other newer-generation DES, with similar rates of stent thrombosis and mortality.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world clinical performance of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stent (DES) (Orsiro) in a large nationwide cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, the two-year outcomes of 4,561 patients implanted with Orsiro (Orsiro group) and 69,570 receiving other newer-generation DES (n-DES group) were analysed. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was low in both groups (0.67% and 0.83% for Orsiro and n-DES, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.46, p-value 0.66). Restenosis was also infrequent (1.5% vs 2.0% with Orsiro and n-DES, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.63-1.03, p-value=0.09). The risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI was lower in the Orsiro group (1.6% vs 2.3%, adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94, p-value=0.013). All-cause mortality and myocardial infarction did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (mortality of 7.5% in both groups, adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.72-1.35, p-value=0.94; 6.0% vs 5.2% for myocardial infarction, adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.43, p-value=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide scenario, the use of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES portended favourable clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buccheri et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=74,131). Orsiro ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs. Other newer-generation drug-eluting stents (n-DES) was evaluated on Target lesion revascularisation by PCI (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p=0.013). The use of the Orsiro ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent significantly reduced the risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI (HR 0.75) compared to other newer-generation drug-eluting stents at two years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: