Key result
Mortality in ambulatory heart failure patients was significantly lower in the 2006-2015 period compared to the 1995-2005 period (HR 0.81), while long-term survival was independent of LVEF category.
Why the study?
The epidemiology, long-term outcomes, and temporal trends in mortality across ambulatory patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF across European countries were not well characterized.
Observational (n=10,312)
Yes
Long-term survival in ambulatory heart failure patients has significantly improved over the last two decades and is independent of LVEF category when adjusting for covariates like NT-proBNP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reflect advances in ambulatory HF care; leaves open causal factors and LVEF-specific interventions for long-term survival.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology, long-term outcomes and temporal trends in mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from three European countries. METHODS: We identified 10 312 patients from the Norwegian HF Registry and the HF registries of the universities of Heidelberg, Germany, and Hull, UK. Patients were classified according to baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and time of enrolment (period 1: 1995-2005 vs period 2: 2006-2015). Predictors of mortality were analysed by use of univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 10 312 patients with stable HF, 7080 (68.7%), 2086 (20.2%) and 1146 (11.1%) were classified as having HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF, respectively. A total of 4617 (44.8%) patients were included in period 1, and 5695 (55.2%) patients were included in period 2. Baseline characteristics significantly differed with respect to type of HF and time of enrolment. During a median follow-up of 66 (33-105) months, 5297 patients (51.4%) died. In multivariable analyses, survival was independent of LVEF category (p>0.05), while mortality was lower in period 2 as compared with period 1 (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91, p<0.001). Significant predictors of all-cause mortality regardless of HF category were increasing age, New York Heart Association functional class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and use of loop diuretics. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory patients with HF stratified by LVEF represent different phenotypes. However, after adjusting for a wide range of covariates, long-term survival is independent of LVEF category. Outcome significantly improved during the last two decades irrespective from type of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fröhlich et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=10,312). Enrolment in Period 2 (2006-2015) vs. Enrolment in Period 1 (1995-2005) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91, p=<0.001). Mortality in ambulatory heart failure patients was significantly lower in the 2006-2015 period compared to the 1995-2005 period (HR 0.81), while long-term survival was independent of LVEF category.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: