Key result
An acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise elicited domain-specific changes in cognitive function, improving simple computational tasks (d = 1.01) while impairing delayed recall.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the influence of an acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise on measures of cognitive function.
Does an acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise improve or impair cognitive function in resistance-trained men?
Does an acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise improve or impair cognitive function in resistance-trained men?
Standardized Mean Difference: 1.01
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 23.8%
p-value: p=0.003
High-intensity resistance exercise elicits domain-specific effects on cognitive function, facilitating simple computational tasks while impairing complex memory and recall tasks.
Acute high-intensity resistance exercise may aid computation yet impair recall; hypothesis-generating in trained men and requires randomized confirmation before any timing guidance.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of an acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise on measures of cognitive function. Ten men (Mean ± SD: age = 24.4 ± 3.2 yrs; body mass = 85.7 ± 11.8 kg; height = 1.78 ± 0.08 m; 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 139.0 ± 24.1 kg) gave informed consent and performed a high-intensity 6 sets of 10 repetitions of barbell back squat exercise at 80% 1RM with 2 minutes rest between sets. The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) was completed to assess various cognitive domains during the familiarization period, immediately before, and immediately after the high-intensity resistance exercise bout. The repeated measures ANOVAs for throughput scores (r·m-1) demonstrated significant mean differences for the Mathematical Processing task (MTH; p < 0.001, η2p = 0.625) where post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the post-fatigue throughput (32.0 ± 8.8 r·m-1) was significantly greater than the pre-fatigue (23.8 ± 7.4 r·m-1, p = 0.003, d = 1.01) and the familiarization throughput (26.4 ± 5.3 r·m-1, p = 0.024, d = 0.77). The Coded Substitution-Delay task also demonstrated significant mean differences (CDD; p = 0.027, η2p = 0.394) with post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrating that the post-fatigue throughput (49.3 ± 14.4 r·m-1) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue throughput (63.2 ± 9.6 r·m-1, p = 0.011, d = 1.14). The repeated measures ANOVAs for reaction time (ms) demonstrated significant mean differences for MTH (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.624) where post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the post-fatigue reaction time (1885.2 ± 582.8 ms) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue (2518.2 ± 884.8 ms, p = 0.005, d = 0.85) and familiarization (2253.7 ± 567.6 ms, p = 0.009, d = 0.64) reaction times. The Go/No-Go task demonstrated significant mean differences (GNG; p = 0.031, η2p = 0.320) with post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrating that the post-fatigue (285.9 ± 16.3 ms) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue (298.5 ± 12.1 ms, p = 0.006, d = 0.88) reaction times. High-intensity resistance exercise may elicit domain-specific influences on cognitive function, characterized by the facilitation of simple cognitive tasks and impairments of complex cognitive tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anders et al. (2021) studied Healthy (n=10). High-intensity resistance exercise (barbell back squat) vs. Pre-fatigue baseline was evaluated on Mathematical Processing task (MTH) throughput (r·m-1) (d = 1.01, p=0.003). An acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise elicited domain-specific changes in cognitive function, improving simple computational tasks (d = 1.01) while impairing delayed recall.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: