Key result
Acute resistance exercise improves cognitive flexibility in females but not males across all modalities.
Why the study?
The study aimed to examine the effects of different modalities of acute resistance exercise on cognition and hemodynamics, including internal carotid artery blood flow.
Does acute resistance exercise of varying loads and blood flow restriction improve cognition and internal carotid artery blood flow in young, healthy adults?
RCT (n=20)
Randomized, counter-balanced
No
Does acute resistance exercise of varying loads and blood flow restriction improve cognition and internal carotid artery blood flow in young, healthy adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs -2.6%
p-value: p=0.007
Acute resistance exercise, regardless of modality (including blood flow restriction and varying loads), significantly improved cognitive flexibility and executive function in young healthy females but not males, without altering internal carotid artery blood flow.
Does not alter practice in healthy adults; extends RCT evidence on sex-specific cognitive responses to resistance exercise.
The aim was to examine the effects of modalities of acute resistance exercise (RE) on cognition and hemodynamics including internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow (BF). Twenty adults completed familiarization and experimental visits. One-repetition maximum (1RM) for bilateral leg extension was quantified, and baseline executive functioning was determined from three run-in visits. Subsequent visits included three randomized, volume-equated, acute exercise bouts of 30 %1RM+blood flow restriction (BFR), 30 %1RM, and 70 %1RM. Both 30 %1RM trials completed four sets of exercise (1 × 30, 3 × 15), and the 70 %1RM condition completed four sets of 8 repetitions. BFR was induced with 40 % of the pressure to occlude the femoral arteries. 11 min following each exercise, participants completed the Stroop and Shifting Attention Tests. Baseline and post-exercise values were used to calculate change scores. The resulting mean change scores were evaluated with mixed factorial ANOVAs. A p≤0.05 was considered significant. All measured outcome variables increased in response to exercise. The ANOVAs for cognitive scores indicated no significant (p>0.05) interactions. For cognitive flexibility and executive function index, there were main effects of Sex. Change scores of the females were significantly greater than the males for cognitive flexibility (7.6 ± 5.9 vs. -2.6 ± 8.4 au; p=0.007) and executive function index (7.4 ± 4.6 vs. -2.5 ± 6.5 au; p=0.001). For ICA BF, there was no significant interaction or any main effect. The females exhibited a smaller exercise-induced increase in blood pressure compared to the males (17.7 ± 5.9 vs. 11.0 ± 4.1 mmHg; p=0.010). Each RE modality yielded acute improvements in cognition, but only for females. There were no cognitive improvements related to BFR such that each RE bout yielded similar results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batman et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Healthy young adults (n=20). Acute resistance exercise modalities vs. Within-subject pre-exercise baseline (and cross-comparison of modalities) was evaluated on Change in cognitive flexibility (Females vs Males) (p=0.007). Acute resistance exercise improved cognitive flexibility and executive function in females but not males, with no differences observed between exercise modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: