Key result
High-load resistance exercise improved working memory performance (d = 0.80) and inhibitory control while increasing right hemisphere oxygenated haemoglobin compared to moderate-load exercise and resting control.
Why the study?
The effects of acute resistance exercise at different intensities on specific executive function domains and underlying brain hemodynamics remained unclear.
Does acute resistance exercise at high or moderate loads improve executive function and brain hemodynamics in healthy young adults?
RCT (n=42)
Open-label
Online randomisation tool
No
Does acute resistance exercise at high or moderate loads improve executive function and brain hemodynamics in healthy young adults?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.8
High-load resistance exercise elicits greater improvements in working memory and inhibitory control, accompanied by stronger prefrontal brain oxygenation, compared to moderate-load exercise.
Supports preferring high-load resistance exercise for acute executive-function gains in healthy young adults; extends evidence linking load to prefrontal oxygenation.
Acute resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to improve executive function (EF), but its effects at different intensities on specific EF domains (e.g., inhibition, working memory) and underlying brain mechanisms (i.e., brain hemodynamics) remain unclear. METHODS: Forty-two young, active, and healthy adults (mean age = 26.9 ± 0.8 years; 24 men) were randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups: 1) RE at high load (HRE) (75% of 1RM), 2) RE at moderate load (MRE) (50% of estimated of 1RM) and 3) a resting control condition (CON). Participants completed Stroop and N-back tasks (i.e., measuring inhibition and working memory) to assess EF at three time points: pre-exercise, post-exercise (Post), and 45 minutes post-exercise (Post45). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to determine changes in brain hemodynamics during cognitive testing. RESULTS: HRE produced small to moderate improvements in Stroop incongruent trial performance (d=0.40) and moderate gains on the 2-back working memory task (d=0.80 post), with smaller improvements on the 1-back task. In comparison, MRE showed weaker effects on Stroop performance but moderate improvements on the 2-back task (d=0.65). HRE showed increases in right hemisphere oxygenated haemoglobin (O 2 Hb) across tasks, particularly under higher cognitive load (d = 0.65 in congruent Stroop trials). MRE induced smaller but notable O 2 Hb increases (d=0.35–0.54), whereas CON showed little or declining O 2 Hb levels. CONCLUSION: HRE was associated with greater improvements in EF, particularly inhibition and working memory, and was associated with stronger and more sustained functional brain hemodynamics changes compared to MRE. • High-load resistance exercise (HRE) led to greater improvements in inhibition and working memory compared to moderate-load and control conditions. • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy revealed stronger and more lateralised prefrontal activation, particularly in the right hemisphere, following HRE. • Cognitive benefits from HRE persisted up to 45 minutes post-exercise, especially during high-demand tasks like the 2-back and incongruent Stroop trials. • The study provides novel mechanistic insights into how resistance exercise intensity modulates executive function and prefrontal brain oxygenation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martins et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy adults (n=42). High-load resistance exercise (HRE) vs. Moderate-load resistance exercise (MRE) and resting control was evaluated on 2-back working memory task reaction time (Post-exercise) (d = 0.80). High-load resistance exercise improved working memory performance (d = 0.80) and inhibitory control while increasing right hemisphere oxygenated haemoglobin compared to moderate-load exercise and resting control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: