Reveals improved oxygen extraction in critically ill patients with high baseline extraction ratios, indicating the potential for personalized transfusion triggers.
Background The decision‐making process for red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains primarily guided by hemoglobin‐based thresholds. However, as a component of personalized medicine, innovative and individualized criteria should be developed to optimize RBCT decisions. This study aims to assess the impact of RBCTs on oxygenation parameters and patient outcomes, with a specific focus on the oxygen extraction ratio (O 2 ER). Study Design and Methods This prospective observational study included 77 critically ill patients receiving RBCTs according to ICU transfusion protocols. The primary hypothesis is that patients with an O 2 ER > 0.30 will benefit most from RBCTs. To investigate this, patients receiving RBCTs were divided into two groups: those with O 2 ER > 0.30 (RBCTs appropriate) and those with O 2 ER ≤ 0.30 (RBCTs appropriateness questionable). The two groups were compared in terms of primarily O 2 ER, other oxygenation parameters, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the change in O 2 ER following RBCTs, while secondary outcomes encompassed other oxygenation parameter changes. Results The O 2 ER > 0.30 group showed significant improvement in O 2 ER (0.38 ± 0.04 vs. 0.32 ± 0.05; p < .001), whereas no such improvement was observed in the O 2 ER ≤ 0.30 group (0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05; p : .017). Additionally, the O 2 ER > 0.30 group exhibited improvements in central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) following RBCTs, which were not seen in the O 2 ER ≤ 0.30 group. Discussion Our study reveals promising insights into the impact of RBCTs on O 2 ER; however, these physiological changes did not result in significant clinical improvements. Hence, this study provides a rational basis for the feasibility of implementing a personalized strategy focused on physiological triggers for RBCTs. Trial registration number : NCT05798130 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05798130 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tüzen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: