Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent contributions in moral philosophy have raised questions concerning the prevalent assumption that moral judgments are typologically discrete, and thereby distinct from ordinary and/or other types of judgments. This paper adds to this discourse, surveying how attempts at defining what makes moral judgments distinct have serious shortcomings, and it is argued that any typological definition is likely to fail due to certain questionable assumptions about the nature of judgment itself. The paper concludes by raising questions for future investigations into the nature of moral judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sackris et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: