Key result
Female sex was associated with a lower systemic vascular resistance index in adults under 50 but a higher index in those 50 and older, though substantial overlap existed between sexes.
Why the study?
Whether sex differences exist in hemodynamic profiles among individuals with elevated blood pressure is not well understood and could help personalize treatment.
Are there sex-specific differences in hemodynamic profiles among adults with elevated blood pressure?
Cross-Sectional (n=45,082)
Yes
Are there sex-specific differences in hemodynamic profiles among adults with elevated blood pressure?
Mean Difference: -31.7 (95% CI -51.2–-12.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 2326% vs 2435.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
While there are age-dependent sex differences in hemodynamic profiles among patients with elevated blood pressure, the substantial overlap between sexes suggests that sex alone is insufficient to guide personalized antihypertensive therapy.
Substantial overlap means sex alone should not guide BP therapy; leaves open whether age-sex hemodynamics merit prospective outcome trials.
Background Whether there are sex differences in hemodynamic profiles among people with elevated blood pressure is not well understood and could guide personalization of treatment. Methods and results We described the clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of adults with elevated blood pressure in China using impedance cardiography. We included 45,082 individuals with elevated blood pressure (defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥130 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥80 mmHg), of which 35.2% were women. Overall, women had a higher mean systolic blood pressure than men (139.0 [±15.7] mmHg vs 136.8 [±13.8] mmHg, P<0.001), but a lower mean diastolic blood pressure (82.6 [±9.0] mmHg vs 85.6 [±8.9] mmHg, P<0.001). After adjusting for age, region, and body mass index, women <50 years old had lower systemic vascular resistance index (beta-coefficient [β] -31.7; 95% CI: -51.2, -12.2) and higher cardiac index (β 0.07; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.09) than men of their same age group, whereas among those ≥50 years old women had higher systemic vascular resistance index (β 120.4; 95% CI: 102.4, 138.5) but lower cardiac index (β -0.15; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.13). Results were consistent with a propensity score matching sensitivity analysis, although the magnitude of the SVRI difference was lower and non-significant. However, there was substantial overlap between women and men in the distribution plots of these variables, with overlapping areas ranging from 78% to 88%. Conclusions Our findings indicate that there are sex differences in hypertension phenotype, but that sex alone is insufficient to infer an individual’s profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caraballo et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Elevated blood pressure (n=45,082). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) in adults <50 years old (β -31.7, 95% CI -51.2, -12.2, p=<0.001). Female sex was associated with a lower systemic vascular resistance index in adults under 50 but a higher index in those 50 and older, though substantial overlap existed between sexes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: