Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, low-order integral-proportional (IP), modified IP (m-IP), and modified integral-proportional-derivative (m-IPD) controllers are designed for the speed control of a two-mass system based on a normalized model and polynomial method. In order to have sufficient damping, the parameters of the controllers are determined through characteristic-ratio assignment under the principle that all the characteristic ratios should be larger than two. It is found that for an inertia ratio smaller than one-third, an IP controller can effectively suppress the vibrations with proper damping, while for a relatively larger inertia ratio, an m-IP controller (i.e., IP controller with an additional low-pass filter) is effective. m-IPD control is theoretically effective for a large inertia ratio. However, the necessity of a negative derivative gain leads to a very poor robustness. Both simulation and experimental results verified the effectiveness of the designed IP and m-IP controllers when the inertia ratio is relatively small. For the m-IPD controller, its poor robustness is demonstrated by introducing a large gear backlash in experiments, while the IP and m-IP controllers show promising results of a much better robustness against the gear backlash nonlinearity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: