Major post-operative adverse physiological events are highly prevalent (40%) in non-cardiac surgical patients, particularly among the elderly and those undergoing thoracic or vascular surgery.
May warrant enhanced monitoring in elderly non-cardiac surgery patients; leaves open whether preventive strategies reduce events in trials.
OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of major post-operative adverse physiological events in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: Non-cardiac, surgical in-patients were studied for the first three post-operative days. Daily assessment was by patient visit, chart review and laboratory result analysis. Pre-determined diagnostic criteria for the identification of adverse physiological events were used. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were studied. The mean age was 61 +/- 20 years. Forty-four were female and 63 were male. Pre-operatively, 48 patients had one or more of 34 different co-morbidities. Forty three (40%) of the 107 patients had one or more major adverse physiological events. These events included hypotension 24 (22%), altered mental state 16 (15%), oliguria 9 (8.4%), abnormal heart rate 8 (7.5%) and abnormal respiratory rate 5 (4.7%). Morbidity associated with these events included respiratory failure 5 (4.7%), prolonged altered mental state 5, (4.7%), and septic shock 3 (2.8%). There were two deaths. Adverse physiological events were common in thoracic 5/9 (56%), neurosurgical 4/10 (40%) and vascular 8/13 (62%) patients. Prolonged altered mental state was most common among orthopaedic patients 5/22 (23%). Adverse physiological events were more frequent in the elderly than the young: 14/52 (27%) in those who were less than 65 years of age versus 29/55 (53%) in those who were 65 years and older (p < 0.025). There was a non-significant increase (p < 0.1) in adverse physiological events in patients having emergency surgery 16/28 (57%) compared with those having elective surgery 27/79 (34%). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a high incidence of post-operative adverse physiological events in surgical patients in a university teaching hospital and identifies several high-risk groups. Further studies are needed to define the clinical significance of these events, appropriate management and prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: