Why the study?
Is open heart surgery safe and effective in patients with bacterial endocarditis complicated by progressive congestive heart failure?
Is open heart surgery safe and effective in patients with bacterial endocarditis complicated by progressive congestive heart failure?
Open heart surgery can be safely and effectively performed for progressive heart failure due to valve destruction during or shortly after treatment of bacterial endocarditis, without recurrent sepsis.
Supports surgery in select endocarditis cases with progressive HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Open heart surgery has been performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital in 13 patients less than 6 months after the initiation of treatment for acute or subacute bacterial endocarditis. The endocarditis involved the aortic valve in 12 cases and a mitral valve prosthesis in the other. In two patients there was concomitant rupture of chordae tendineae of the mitral valve. One patient received no preoperative antibiotics, and four were still receiving their initial course of therapy at the time of surgery. The primary indication for surgery in all cases was progressive or intractable congestive heart failure. Ten underwent replacement of the aortic valve alone, two had both aortic and mitral valves replaced, and one had a mitral prosthesis replaced. Of the 13 patients, 10 are alive and doing well, although paraprosthetic insufficiency developed in three, two of whom required subsequent surgical repair. Three patients died, two in the early postoperative period, and one, 8 months after surgery from paraprosthetic regurgitation with hemolysis and heart failure. Antibiotics were given during and after surgery for as long as 6 weeks. In no case has recurrent sepsis been a problem. Our experience indicates that open heart surgery, when necessitated by progressive congestive heart failure due to valve destruction, can be safely and effectively performed during or shortly after treatment of bacterial endocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stason et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: