Key result
Repeated echocardiography at 3 months showed improved systolic function in 79% of patients with severe baseline dysfunction, while no patients with preserved baseline LVEF declined to severe.
Why the study?
Does repeated echocardiography at 3 months change left ventricular function classification in patients with first STEMI treated with primary PCI?
Observational (n=138)
Does repeated echocardiography at 3 months change left ventricular function classification in patients with first STEMI treated with primary PCI?
Repeated echocardiography at 3 months is clinically useful for STEMI patients with reduced baseline LVEF, as many improve, but may be unnecessary for those with initially preserved LVEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective repeat echocardiography in severe baseline dysfunction post-STEMI; leaves open necessity in preserved LVEF.
AIM: Changes in left ventricular (LV) function using echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were assessed in a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population to assess whether repeated imaging is necessary. METHODS: In a prospective study patients with first STEMI were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and examined with 2D-echocardiography and CMR at baseline (<72 h) and at a three-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were included (60±11 years). Using 2D-echocardiography at baseline preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (>50%) was found in 48 patients (35%), mild/moderate systolic dysfunction (35-50%) in 76 patients (55%) and severe dysfunction (<35%) in 14 patients (10%). Improvement in systolic function group was seen in 58 patients (64%) and 11 patients (79%) with severe systolic dysfunction at baseline were re-classified as having preserved or mild/moderate systolic dysfunction at follow-up. Irrespective of baseline LVEF, deterioration in systolic function group was noted in 14 patients (11%), but no patients declined from preserved to severe systolic dysfunction. The recovered myocardium measured with the myocardial salvage index by CMR was significantly lower with declining LVEF at baseline. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with severely depressed LVEF immediately after STEMI significantly improved systolic function after three months. This study emphasises the importance of a repeated LV function assessment at follow-up in patients with mild/moderate or severe systolic dysfunction after STEMI, but re-assessment may not be needed in patients with preserved LVEF at baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Søholm et al. (2014) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=138). Repeated echocardiography and CMR vs. Baseline imaging was evaluated on Changes in left ventricular (LV) function. Repeated echocardiography at 3 months showed improved systolic function in 79% of patients with severe baseline dysfunction, while no patients with preserved baseline LVEF declined to severe.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: