Key result
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) provides a less invasive, acceptably accurate, and rapidly computed alternative to wire-based fractional flow reserve for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
Why the study?
Does Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) provide accurate physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis compared to wire-based FFR?
Does Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) provide accurate physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis compared to wire-based FFR?
QFR is a less invasive, acceptably accurate, and rapidly computed alternative to wire-based FFR for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
May support QFR use where wire-based FFR is impractical; leaves open need for outcome trials before practice change.
A less invasive method of pressure guidewire-free image-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) computation has been developed and investigated comprehensively. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is one of the image-based FFR computed using three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and estimated flow velocity. Several studies, including meta-analyses have reported that QFR had a good diagnostic accuracy compared with wire-based FFR as reference standards, and was rapidly computed for approximately 5 minutes per vessel. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance of QFR to detect myocardial ischemia has been found to be comparable with that of other modalities, such as instantaneous wave-free ratio, myocardial perfusion imaging and FFR derived from computed tomography (FFR-CT).Considering the advantages of QFR compared with wire-based FFR, i.e. (1) less invasive, (2) acceptably accurate, and (3) quickly computed, QFR may be potentially preferred in clinical applications for specific situations, such as risk stratification in multivessel disease, non-culprit lesion assessment in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), strategic guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and post-PCI lesion assessment.This review article highlights the current usage, clinical implications, and future perspectives of angiography-derived FFR, particularly QFR, one of the primary computations investigated in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masato Otsuka (2021) conducted a review in Coronary artery stenosis. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) vs. Wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) provides a less invasive, acceptably accurate, and rapidly computed alternative to wire-based fractional flow reserve for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: