Key result
AT1 receptor blockade with candesartan resulted in a several-fold greater increase in renal sodium excretion in Dahl salt-sensitive rats compared to salt-resistant rats.
Salt-dependent hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats may be driven by enhanced Ang-II mediated sodium retention due to increased AT1 receptor affinity.
AT1 blockade may preferentially enhance natriuresis in salt-sensitive models; hypothesis-generating and leaves open human translation.
Salt-sensitive individuals are susceptible to develop hypertension when exposed to high salt-diet. Such a phenomenon is considered to be due to a genetic impairment in the renal excretion of sodium. In the present studies extent of endogenous angiotensin-II (Ang-II) mediated antinatriuresis was comparatively evaluated in Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) and salt-resistant (SR) rats, using a selective AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan. In addition, differences in plasma renin activity and characteristics of Ang-II receptors in the renal cortical tubular membranes were also examined. Under INACTIN anesthesia AT1 receptor blockade resulted in significant increases in renal sodium excretion, which was several-fold greater in SS rats than that observed in SR rats. These observations suggest that antinatriuretic function of endogenous angiotensin-II is exaggerated in SS rats. This functional overexpression appears to be related to an increase in the affinity of Ang-II receptors in renal cortical tubular membranes but not to receptor density or plasma renin activity. It is proposed that salt-dependent hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats may be due to enhanced Ang-II mediated sodium retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tallam et al. (2001) studied Salt-sensitive hypertension. Candesartan vs. Salt-resistant (SR) rats was evaluated on Renal sodium excretion. AT1 receptor blockade with candesartan resulted in a several-fold greater increase in renal sodium excretion in Dahl salt-sensitive rats compared to salt-resistant rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: