Key result
Resumption of the LaLiga championship after a 12-week COVID-19 lockdown did not significantly affect injury incidence compared to the pre-lockdown period (5.4 vs. 4.2 injuries per 1000 h, p=0.338).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine whether mean injury incidence in LaLiga football players differed between the pre-lockdown and post-lockdown periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Does the post-lockdown resumption of competition increase injury incidence in professional football players compared to the pre-lockdown period?
Observational (n=277)
Yes
Does the post-lockdown resumption of competition increase injury incidence in professional football players compared to the pre-lockdown period?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 4.2%
p-value: p=0.338
The conditioning strategy and adaptation of in-game regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic prevented an increase in injury incidence among professional football players after a 12-week lockdown.
Supports safe post-lockdown resumption in football; hypothesis-generating for conditioning strategies and requires prospective confirmation.
The first division of Spanish professional football (LaLiga) was suspended for 12 weeks as part of the policies enforced by health authorities during the first wave of COVID-19. During this period, players were confined to home for 8 weeks, followed by a club-based retraining period of 4 weeks. Afterwards, LaLiga’s teams completed 11 matches, with approximately 3 days of recovery between matches, to finish the competition. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether there is a difference in mean injury incidence in LaLiga players between the pre-lockdown period and post-lockdown period. A total of 277 players belonging to 11 teams competing in LaLiga were monitored during the 2019–2020 season. Injury incidence in the 27 matchdays completed before the lockdown was compared to the last 11 matchdays completed after the resumption of the competition. In comparison to the period before the suspension, the resumption of the championship did not significantly affect the injury incidence (4.2 vs. 5.4 injuries per 1000 h of exposure, p = 0.338). Injury incidence before suspension and after resumption of the competition was similar for muscle (2.6 vs. 3.4 injuries per 1000 h of exposure, p = 0.152) and ligament injuries (0.8 vs. 0.4 injuries per 1000 h of exposure, p = 0.062). The resumption of the competition also did not modify the distribution of injury according to body location (p = 0.948), injury type (p = 0.766), mode of onset (p = 0.614), severity (p = 0.065), or player position (p = 0.295). In summary, mean injury incidence in LaLiga players was similar before and after the lockdown. It is probable that the conditioning strategy adopted by clubs before the resumption of LaLiga and the adaptation of some in-game regulations helped to avoid an increased injury rate after the lockdown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno-Pérez et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Professional football players (n=277). Post-lockdown resumption of competition vs. Pre-lockdown period was evaluated on Mean injury incidence (injuries per 1000 h of exposure) (p=0.338). Resumption of the LaLiga championship after a 12-week COVID-19 lockdown did not significantly affect injury incidence compared to the pre-lockdown period (5.4 vs. 4.2 injuries per 1000 h, p=0.338).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: