Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The detection of C-terminal dystrophin in DMD muscle challenges the frame-shift hypothesis and impacts the interpretation of myoblast transfer experiments.
Previously we have shown low levels of dystrophin immunoreactivity in muscle from patients with DMD. According to the "frame-shift hypothesis" DMD muscle should not synthesize any dystrophin through to the C-terminus and it has been suggested that the protein detected is not dystrophin, but a related autosomal homologue. We have labelled serial sections of DMD muscle with specific monoclonal antibodies to the amino, rod and C-terminal domains of dystrophin and find labelling on the same individual fibres, allowing us to conclude that the protein detected is Xp21-encoded dystrophin. This has an impact on the interpretation of myoblast transfer experiments. The abundance (on blots) of "C-terminal dystrophin" appears lower than "rod dystrophin" in both BMD and DMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholson et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: