Why the study?
Does the withdrawal of enalapril after 6 months of treatment post-myocardial infarction reverse its benefits on left ventricular structure?
Does the withdrawal of enalapril after 6 months of treatment post-myocardial infarction reverse its benefits on left ventricular structure?
The structural benefits of 6 months of enalapril therapy initiated early after myocardial infarction are maintained for at least 4-6 weeks after drug withdrawal.
May support short-term enalapril withdrawal post-MI without LV deterioration; leaves open longer-term effects and practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the reduction in left ventricular dilatation after acute myocardial infarction obtained by early administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors depends on continuous treatment. DESIGN: Prospective observational and cross sectional study of withdrawal of randomised treatment with enalapril or placebo. PATIENTS: 106 patients on 6 months trial treatment after an acute myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction as assessed by echocardiography and circulating proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) before and 4-6 weeks after withdrawal of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant changes (mean (SD)) in left ventricular systolic (0.7 (4.7) ml/m2) and diastolic (0.4 (6.6) ml/m2) volume indices, ejection fraction (-0.9 (6)%), and proatrial natriuretic factor (172 (992) pmol/l) after withdrawal of enalapril. The significantly lower left ventricular volumes observed with 6 months of enalapril therapy after acute myocardial infarction, as compared with placebo, were maintained 6 weeks after drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: The results show that the benefit of 6 months of enalapril treatment initiated early after myocardial infarction is maintained for at least 6 weeks after drug withdrawal, suggesting that the treatment effect on left ventricular structure is not reversed by changes in loading conditions caused by subsequent drug withdrawal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonarjee et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: