Key result
Lower left atrial appendage voltage in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased prevalence of ischemic stroke (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Low atrial voltage is linked to increased stroke risk, but the relationship between left atrial appendage voltage and ischemic stroke in patients with AF remains unknown.
Is lower left atrial appendage voltage associated with an increased prevalence of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Case-Control (n=1,108)
Is lower left atrial appendage voltage associated with an increased prevalence of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.87)
p-value: p=<0.001
Lower left atrial appendage voltage measured during sinus rhythm after ablation is strongly associated with a history of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
May flag higher stroke risk via LAA voltage in AF; leaves open utility beyond current scores.
BACKGROUND: Low atrial voltage is associated with an increased risk of stroke. The relationship between left atrial appendage voltage (LAAV) and ischemic stroke remains unknown. Low LAAV may predict the prevalence of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A total of 1108 patients with AF referred for catheter ablation were consecutively included from January 2015 to May 2018. The patients were divided into stroke and control groups based on previous ischemic stroke by neuroimaging criteria. LAAV was measured with a circular mapping catheter in sinus rhythm after ablation. Variables were compared, and logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between LAAV and stroke. RESULTS: -VASc score was higher and left atrial diameter was larger in the patients with stroke. More left atrial appendage thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast were detected in the stroke group. LAAV was significantly lower in the stroke group compared with the controls (5.3 ± 1.8 mV vs. 6.5 ± 1.8 mV; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a lower LAAV was associated with increased stroke prevalence [odds ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001]. LAAV had a predictive value, with an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87; p < 0.001). With an optimal cut-off value of 5.2 mV for LAAV, the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 74%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower LAAV in AF patients was associated with increased ischemic stroke prevalence. Whether LAAV is related to incident stroke requires further studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,108). Left atrial appendage voltage (LAAV) vs. Controls without previous ischemic stroke was evaluated on Ischemic stroke prevalence (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87, p=<0.001). Lower left atrial appendage voltage in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased prevalence of ischemic stroke (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: