Why the study?
Coronary atherectomy can cause bradyarrhythmias due to adenosine release, and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction, prompting evaluation of its safety and efficacy.
Does intravenous aminophylline safely and effectively prevent bradyarrhythmia in patients undergoing coronary atherectomy?
Does intravenous aminophylline safely and effectively prevent bradyarrhythmia in patients undergoing coronary atherectomy?
Intravenous aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy appears safe and effective, with a low rate of bailout transvenous pacing and no reported adverse effects.
Should not yet change practice for bradyarrhythmia prevention in atherectomy; leaves open aminophylline efficacy pending randomized trials.
Coronary calcified lesions are commonly encountered and coronary atherectomy is commonly used for lesion modification during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The release of adenosine during atherectomy can result in bradyarrhythmias and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction. We identified 138 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy. A total of 159 calcified lesions were treated, and the atherectomy device was orbital atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and both in 52 %, 42 %, and 6 %; respectively. After administration of aminophylline, 4.3 % of patients required intraprocedural insertion of a transvenous pacer (TVP), and 18.1 % of patients required administration of IV atropine. Technical success was achieved in 98.6 % of patients, and no adverse reactions to aminophylline were reported. All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy was safe and effective. No adverse effects of aminophylline were seen, and the rate of bailout TVP placement was low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakhle et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: