Why the study?
Is coxsackie virus RNA present in muscle biopsies of patients with idiopathic inflammatory muscle disease?
Is coxsackie virus RNA present in muscle biopsies of patients with idiopathic inflammatory muscle disease?
Lytic infection of myocytes by coxsackie virus does not appear to occur in idiopathic inflammatory muscle disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Argues against lytic coxsackie infection in idiopathic myositis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The role of coxsackie virus infection in the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory muscle disease (IIMD) has been investigated by many workers with conflicting results. This study uses in situ hybridization, with digoxigenin-labelled oligonucleotide probes complementary to the coxsackie B virus genome, to investigate the presence of virus RNA in muscle biopsies from 26 patients with IIMD. In the five cases of inclusion body myositis studied, there was focal probe-binding to nuclei and cytoplasm, and in nine cases probe-binding to mast cells was seen. In both of these instances probe-binding was non-specific and not due to hybridization. None of the cases showed the presence of coxsackie virus RNA within muscle and it is concluded that lytic infection of myocytes by coxsackie virus does not occur in IIMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilton et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: