Why the study?
Does defibrillation threshold testing identify unsuccessful shocks in patients undergoing ICD implantation or generator exchange?
Does defibrillation threshold testing identify unsuccessful shocks in patients undergoing ICD implantation or generator exchange?
Defibrillation threshold testing identifies a small but clinically relevant percentage of patients (1.4-2.3%) who cannot be defibrillated with standard approaches, particularly those on amiodarone or with dilated cardiomyopathy and low ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DFT testing may identify high-risk ICD patients for unsuccessful shocks; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has been performed to prove functionality of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Over the past years it has become increasingly controversial because of possible morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine unsuccessful shock testing and report strategies used to overcome these problems. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 314 patients with a de novo implantation of an ICD and 127 patients receiving a generator exchange were identified retrospectively. All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing after induction of VF using a low-energy T-wave shock during the intervention, 2 shock tests after de novo implantations, 1 after generator change. A safety margin of 10 J or more was requested. Seven (2.3%) patients in the de novo group and 2 patients (1.4%) in the generator exchange group could not be defibrillated using the standard approach. All of those patients had either chronic amiodarone therapy, secondary prevention or a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT). In univariate analysis, amiodarone therapy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and lower ejection fraction were predictors of failure. CONCLUSION: Our study's results as well as a review of the current literature favor shock testing, especially in patients with specific risk factors as mentioned above.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vischer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: