Why the study?
Does high-frequency dynamic pacing increase ventricular vulnerability to VF in pacing-induced CHF rabbit hearts compared to controls?
Does high-frequency dynamic pacing increase ventricular vulnerability to VF in pacing-induced CHF rabbit hearts compared to controls?
In a rabbit model of pacing-induced heart failure, high-frequency excitation causes significant action potential duration shortening and spatially discordant alternans, increasing vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation.
Raises caution for high-frequency pacing in failing hearts; leaves open translation to human arrhythmia risk.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) predisposes to ventricular fibrillation (VF) in association with electrical remodeling of the ventricle. However, much remains unknown about the rate-dependent electrophysiological properties in a failing heart. Action potential properties in the left ventricular subepicardial muscles during dynamic pacing were examined with optical mapping in pacing-induced CHF (n=18) and control (n=17) rabbit hearts perfused in vitro. Action potential durations (APDs) in CHF were significantly longer than those observed for controls at basic cycle lengths (BCLs)>1,000 ms but significantly shorter at BCLs<400 ms. Spatial APD dispersions were significantly increased in CHF versus control (by 17-81%), and conduction velocity was significantly decreased in CHF (by 6-20%). In both groups, high-frequency stimulation (BCLs<150 ms) always caused spatial APD alternans; spatially concordant alternans and spatially discordant alternans (SDA) were induced at 60% and 40% in control, respectively, whereas 18% and 82% in CHF. SDA in CHF caused wavebreaks followed by reentrant excitations, giving rise to VF. Incidence of ventricular tachycardia/VFs elicited by high-frequency dynamic pacing (BCLs<150 ms) was significantly higher in CHF versus control (93% vs. 20%). In CHF, left ventricular subepicardial muscles show significant APD shortenings at short BCLs favoring reentry formations following wavebreaks in association with SDA. High-frequency excitation itself may increase the vulnerability to VF in CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harada et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: