Why the study?
Does intrathecal bupivacaine with clonidine compared to bupivacaine with fentanyl improve analgesia in full term parturients with pregnancy induced hypertension undergoing cesarean section?
Does intrathecal bupivacaine with clonidine compared to bupivacaine with fentanyl improve analgesia in full term parturients with pregnancy induced hypertension undergoing cesarean section?
Intrathecal bupivacaine with clonidine provides significantly prolonged analgesia compared to bupivacaine with fentanyl in preeclamptic parturients, though it is associated with more hypotension and sedation.
Supports clonidine over fentanyl for prolonged intrathecal analgesia in preeclamptic cesarean delivery; extends adjuvant options in pregnancy-induced hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Pain free postoperative period and early ambulation are the need of the day for mothers and their neonates for early initiation of breast feeding. It is moral responsibility of Anaesthesiologist to provide a safe and pain free postoperative period with use of various techniques and drug combinations. Spinal anaesthesia has been widely used for caesarean section in normalas well as preeclamptic parturients and has been found to be efficaciousand safe. The present study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effect profile of intrathecal Bupivacaine with Fentanyl and Bupivacaine with Clonidine in cesarean section of parturients with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH). METHODS: 50 full term parturients with pregnancy induced hypertension scheduled for cesarean section were randomized into 2 groups of 25 each. GROUP BF (Bupivacaine with Fentanyl) received 7.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 20g Fentanyl intrathecally. GROUP BC (Bupivacaine with Clonidine) received 7.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 60g clonidine intrathecally. RESULTS: Patients in group BC showed long lasting analgesia compared to group BF (p value<0.05). Both the groups had satisfactory analgesia with hemodynamic stability, however the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement was more in group BC compared to BF. Incidence of pruritus was exceptionally seen in group BF, however more patients were sedated and complained of dry mouth in group BC. Both the groups had comparable APGAR scores with no adverse neonatal effects. CONCLUSION: We conclude use of intrathecal clonidine 60g and Fentanyl 20g both provide excellent sensory and motor blockage with lower dose of bupivacaine. Both drugs improved intraoperative analgesia and prolonged the duration of effective analgesia without any adverse effect on neonate neurobehaviour. Fairly good analgesia with less sedation and better haemodynamic stability is observed with 20g fentanyl .Addition of 60g of clonidine which gives excellent analgesia of significantly prolonged duration than fentanyl; along with sedation is also a better alternative for preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vatsalya et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: