Key result
Successful vs unsuccessful endovascular recanalization reduced predicted infarct volume by 53% at 5 hours, decreasing by 5% per hour up to 15 hours post-onset.
Observational (n=161)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benefit of endovascular recanalization beyond established treatment time windows likely exists in select stroke patients. However, there is currently no imaging model that predicts infarction adjusting for elapsed time between the pathologic snapshot of admission imaging until endovascular recanalization. We trained and cross validated a multivariate generalized linear model (GLM) that uses computer tomography perfusion and clinical data to quantify patient-specific dynamic change of tissue infarction depending on degree and time of recanalization. Multicenter data of 161 patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular therapy were included. Multivariate voxelwise infarct probability was calculated within the GLM. The effect of increasing time to treatment and degree of recanalization on voxelwise infarction was calculated in each patient. Tissue benefit of successful relative to unsuccessful recanalization was shown up to 15 hours after onset in individual patients and decreased nonlinearly with time. On average, the relative reduction of infarct volume at the treatment interval of 5 hours was 53% and this salvage effect decreased by 5% units per hour to <5% after 10 additional hours to treatment. Treatment time-adjusted multivariate prediction of infarction by perfusion and clinical status may identify patients who benefit from extended time to recanalization therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kemmling et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke with proximal anterior circulation occlusion (n=161). Successful endovascular recanalization (modeled via CT perfusion-based multivariate GLM) vs. Unsuccessful endovascular recanalization was evaluated on Relative reduction of infarct volume (tissue salvage) (53% relative reduction at 5 hours). Successful vs unsuccessful endovascular recanalization reduced predicted infarct volume by 53% at 5 hours, decreasing by 5% per hour up to 15 hours post-onset.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: