Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We prospectively studied 40 women over a median period of 28 weeks to ascertain the effects on vaginal microflora of sexual intercourse alone compared with sexual intercourse associated with use of a diaphragm with a spermicide (diaphragm/spermicide). Compared with no sexual intercourse, sexual intercourse with use of a diaphragm/spermicide in the preceding 3 days was strongly associated with increases in rates of vaginal colonization with uropathogenic flora, including Escherichia coli (P < .0001), other gram-negative uropathogens (P = .0045), group D streptococci (P = .014), and group B streptococci (P = .0015). Except for E. coli colonization, no such increases in rates of vaginal colonization were seen at visits preceded by sexual intercourse without use of a diaphragm/spermicide. Compared with no sexual intercourse, sexual intercourse with use of a diaphragm/spermicide in the preceding 3 days also was associated with a marked increase in rates of candidal colonization (P < .0001) and with a decrease in rates of lactobacillus colonization (P < .0001). We conclude that bacterial and fungal microflora in the vagina are strongly influenced by recent use of a diaphragm/spermicide and minimally affected by sexual intercourse alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hooton et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: