Why the study?
Do anaesthesia and abdominal surgery significantly alter continuous computerized on-line vectorcardiography recordings in patients without ischaemic heart disease?
Do anaesthesia and abdominal surgery significantly alter continuous computerized on-line vectorcardiography recordings in patients without ischaemic heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous computerized on-line vectorcardiography is minimally affected by anaesthesia and abdominal surgery, supporting its potential utility for perioperative myocardial ischaemia monitoring.
Myocardial infarction still represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality following surgical procedures. Continuous computerized on-line vector-ECG has previously been shown to be useful in the detection of myocardial ischaemia, in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris and for ischaemia monitoring after PTCA procedures. This method was presently tested for the possible influence of anaesthesia and surgery during cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia (n = 9), and during inguinal hernia repairs using a spinal block (n = 5). The patients had no history, symptoms or signs of ischaemic heart disease. Analyses of vectorcardiographic changes were made in relation to predefined standardized anaesthetic and surgical procedures, all of which potentially could influence the vector-ECG. Three vectorcardiographic trendparameters were studied: QRS-vector difference, ST-vector magnitude and ST-change vector magnitude. The overall vectorcardiographic changes were minimal and smaller than vectorcardiographic changes previously reported during myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Since anaesthetic and surgical procedures per se had only minor effects on the vector ECG recordings, it is concluded that continuous computerized on-line vectorcardiography will not be skewed by these procedures. Hence, vectorcardiography has the potential of becoming a new monitor for the detection of perioperative myocardial ischaemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gannedahl et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: