Endogenous angiotensin II binding to the apical AT1A receptor is critical for baseline HCO3- reabsorption and its response to changes in basolateral CO2 in renal proximal tubules.
Apical AT1A signaling modulates proximal tubule HCO3 handling in rodents; leaves open relevance to human acid-base disorders or therapy.
The proximal tubule (PT) is major site for the reabsorption of filtered HCO(3)(-). Previous work on the rabbit PT showed that 1) increases in basolateral (BL) CO(2) concentration ([CO(2)](BL)) raise the HCO(3)(-) reabsorption rate (J(HCO(3))), and 2) the increase that luminal angiotensin II (ANG II) produces in J(HCO(3)) is greatest at 0% [CO(2)](BL) and falls to nearly zero at 20%. Here, we investigate the role of angiotensin receptors in the [CO(2)](BL) dependence of J(HCO(3)) in isolated perfused PTs. We found that, in rabbit S2 PT segments, luminal 10(-8) M saralasin (peptide antagonist of ANG II receptors), lowers baseline J(HCO(3)) (5% CO(2)) to the value normally seen at 0% in the absence of inhibitors and eliminates the J(HCO(3)) response to changes in [CO(2)](BL). However, basolateral 10(-8) M saralasin has no effect. As with saralasin, luminal 10(-8) M candesartan (AT(1) antagonist) reduces baseline J(HCO(3)) and eliminates the [CO(2)](BL) dependence of J(HCO(3)). Luminal 10(-7) M PD 123319 (AT(2) antagonist) has no effect. Finally, we compared PTs from wild-type and AT(1A)-null mice of the same genetic background. Knocking out AT(1A) modestly lowers baseline J(HCO(3)) and, like luminal saralasin or candesartan in rabbits, eliminates the J(HCO(3)) response to changes in [CO(2)](BL). Our accumulated evidence suggests that ANG II endogenous to the PT binds to the apical AT(1A) receptor and that this interaction is critical for both baseline J(HCO(3)) and its response to changes in [CO(2)](BL). Neither apical AT(2) receptors nor basolateral ANG II receptors are involved in these processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: