PACAP 38 and VIP induce relaxation of the pig urinary bladder neck via VPAC(2) receptors and the cAMP-PKA pathway, suggesting VIP/PACAP receptor antagonists could be useful for treating urinary incontinence.
No immediate clinical implications for incontinence; leaves open VPAC2 antagonists as a target pending human validation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38 (PACAP 38)- and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are widely distributed in the urinary tract, the current study investigated the receptors and mechanisms involved in relaxations induced by these peptides in the pig bladder neck. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Urothelium-denuded strips were suspended in organ baths for isometric force recordings and the relaxations to VIP and PACAP analogues were investigated. KEY RESULTS: VIP, PACAP 38, PACAP 27 and [Ala(11,22,28)]-VIP produced similar relaxations. Inhibition of neuronal voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels reduced relaxations to PACAP 38 and increased those induced by VIP. Blockade of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents (CSPA), nitric oxide (NO)-synthase or guanylate cyclase reduced the PACAP 38 relaxations but failed to modify the VIP responses. Inhibition of VIP/PACAP receptors and of voltage-gated K(+) channels reduced PACAP 38 and VIP relaxations, which were not modified by the K(+) channel blockers iberiotoxin, charybdotoxin, apamin or glibenclamide. The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor rolipram and the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin produced potent relaxations. Blockade of protein kinase A (PKA) reduced PACAP 38- and VIP-induced relaxations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: PACAP 38 and VIP relax the pig urinary bladder neck through muscle VPAC(2) receptors linked to the cAMP-PKA pathway and involve activation of voltage-gated K(+) channels. Facilitatory PAC(1) receptors located at CSPA and coupled to NO release, and inhibitory VPAC receptors at motor endings are also involved in the relaxations to PACAP 38 and VIP, respectively. VIP/PACAP receptor antagonists could be useful in the therapy of urinary incontinence produced by intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: