Why the study?
Does a program encouraging low flow anaesthesia with feedback reduce isoflurane consumption?
Does a program encouraging low flow anaesthesia with feedback reduce isoflurane consumption?
A feedback program encouraging low flow anaesthesia significantly reduced isoflurane consumption and generated substantial cost savings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feedback-driven low-flow anaesthesia was associated with reduced isoflurane use and costs; hypothesis-generating for wider adoption.
A three-month audit of isoflurane consumption at Palmerston North Hospital in 1994 showed an averaged vapour flow rate of approx 85 ml per minute of anaesthesia, equivalent to 1.4% isoflurane at six litres per minute. After purchasing volatile agent analysers, a program encouraging low flow anaesthesia and providing a report of the previous month's consumption rate was started in July 1996. The isoflurane averaged vapour flow rate was tracked over the following twenty-month period and fell by a sustained 65% to range around 30 +/- 5 ml/min, producing savings of approximately NZ$104,000 over this period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew J. McKenzie (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: