Why the study?
Does voluntary static exercise elicit different cardiovascular responses compared to involuntary exercise in healthy subjects?
Does voluntary static exercise elicit different cardiovascular responses compared to involuntary exercise in healthy subjects?
Differential contribution of central command is responsible for varying cardiovascular responses to static exercise depending on the contracting muscle.
Central command may drive muscle-specific responses to voluntary static exercise in healthy subjects; leaves open relevance in cardiovascular disease.
To examine whether central command contributes differently to the cardiovascular responses during voluntary static exercise engaged by different muscle groups, we encouraged healthy subjects to perform voluntary and electrically evoked involuntary static exercise of ankle dorsal and plantar flexion. Each exercise was conducted with 25% of the maximum voluntary force of the right ankle dorsal and plantar flexion, respectively, for 2 min. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded, and stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance were calculated. With voluntary exercise, HR, MAP, and CO significantly increased during dorsal flexion (the maximum increase, HR: 12 ± 2.3 beats/min; MAP: 14 ± 2.0 mmHg; CO: 1 ± 0.2 l/min), whereas only MAP increased during plantar flexion (the maximum increase, 6 ± 2.0 mmHg). Stroke volume and total peripheral resistance were unchanged throughout the two kinds of voluntary static exercise. With involuntary exercise, there were no significant changes in all cardiovascular variables, irrespective of dorsal or plantar flexion. Furthermore, before the force onset of voluntary static exercise, HR and MAP started to increase without muscle contraction, whereas they had no significant changes with involuntary exercise at the moment. The present findings indicate that differential contribution of central command is responsible for the different cardiovascular responses to static exercise, depending on the strength of central control of the contracting muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: