This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Initial research shows moral injury is prevalent among secure mental healthcare staff, yet there are a limited tools developed for healthcare populations. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Moral Injury Exposure and Symptoms Scale-Civilian (MIESS-C) with mental health professionals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (N=322) revealed a two-factor model: “moral self-transgressions” and “other and organizational betrayal.” Items related to others’ transgressions were excluded due to cross-loading. The subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency and convergent validity with psychological distress measures. The MIESS-C is partially supported for assessing moral injury in this context, though caution is advised.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webb et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: