Hemodynamic Variability in Aortic Stenosis and Regurgitation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self‐Expanding Valves

Objective This study investigated the impact of pathological differences between aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) on hemodynamic outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with a focus on the performance of self‐expanding valves relative to annular anatomy. Methods In this single‐center, retrospective study, patients undergoing TAVR for AS or AR were stratified by annulus area into smaller (< 430 cm 2 ) and larger (≥ 430 cm 2 ) subgroups. Valve sizing was based on annular dimensions (≥ 27 mm for AR/smaller annulus; < 27 mm for AS subgroups). Hemodynamic parameters (aortic valve area [AVA], pressure gradients, and velocity) and prosthesis characteristics (sheath size and compression ratio) were evaluated pre‐ and postoperatively, with 1‐year follow‐up. Results The AR group required larger sheaths ( p = 0.006) and demonstrated superior hemodynamics compared to the AS group: larger postoperative AVA (3.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.2 ± 0.5 and 2.1 ± 0.6 cm 2 in larger and smaller annuli, respectively, p < 0.001); lower maximum (9.7 ± 4.3 vs. 15.8 ± 9.2 and 18.8 ± 10.8 mmHg in larger and smaller annuli, respectively, p < 0.001) and mean gradients (7.8 ± 4.4 mmHg vs. others, p < 0.001); and reduced aortic velocity (1.60 ± 0.43 vs. others, p = 0.038). Smaller annuli exhibited higher prosthesis compression (0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04 in AR and 0.8 ± 0.06 in larger annulus, p < 0.001), with 20% ( n = 8) developing elevated transvalvular gradients (> 20 mmHg) at follow‐up. Conclusions One‐year outcomes revealed distinct hemodynamic profiles post‐TAVR between AR and AS groups based on annular size. Patients with AR exhibited more favorable valve performance, supporting TAVR in younger, low‐risk patients with AR who have suitable annular anatomy.