Why the study?
Does age and training status affect cardiovascular and peak VO2 responses during supine exercise compared to treadmill exercise in men?
Does age and training status affect cardiovascular and peak VO2 responses during supine exercise compared to treadmill exercise in men?
The effects of aging on peak VO2 are similar during treadmill and supine exercise, but the heart rate response to supine exercise is attenuated in healthy older men, contributing to their reduced peak VO2.
Supine testing may underestimate responses in older men; hypothesis-generating for age-training interactions on chronotropic reserve.
Although stroke volume during exercise is affected by aging and posture, few studies have carefully examined the heart rate, blood pressure, and peak oxygen uptake (VO2) responses of older subjects to supine exercise. The present study examined these responses during graded supine cycling in younger (21-30 yr) and older (51-62 yr) untrained (Treadmill VO2max = 47.0 vs 32.3 ml.kg-1.min-1) and endurance-trained (66.3 vs 52.7 ml.kg-1.min-1) men (N = 6/group). All subjects had lower (P < 0.05) peak VO2 (ml.min-1) and peak heart rate responses during supine cycling compared with treadmill exercise. Additionally, the age-related reduction in peak VO2 (approximately 20-30%) was similar for supine compared with treadmill testing, even when normalized to fat-free leg volume and fat-free mass, respectively. However, at given absolute intensities (VO2) of supine exercise, heart rates were 10-15 beats.min-1 less (P < 0.05) in both older groups. Across relative supine work intensities (% of peak), systolic pressure increased most rapidly in the younger trained and older untrained groups. These findings suggest that the effects of aging on peak VO2 are similar during treadmill and supine exercise in both endurance-trained and untrained men. These data also indicate that the heart rate response to supine exercise is attenuated in healthy older men and contributes to their reduced peak VO2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proctor et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: