Why the study?
Does long-term warfarin treatment increase the risk of hematoma enlargement in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage?
Does long-term warfarin treatment increase the risk of hematoma enlargement in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage?
Long-term warfarin treatment is independently associated with a significantly higher risk of hematoma enlargement and mortality in patients presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
Supports monitoring for expansion in warfarin-treated acute ICH; leaves open reversal efficacy in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between warfarin administration and the frequent development of enlarged hematomas in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial. The present study was carried out to examine this issue. METHODS: This study reviewed 41 patients with nontraumatic ICH within 24 h after stroke onset from 1999 to 2003 who received long-term warfarin treatment (29 men and 12 women, 70 +/- 12 years old) and 323 patients who had not been on warfarin (177 men and 146 women, 66 +/- 13 years old). The hematoma volume (HV) on admission, final HV, frequency of hematoma enlargement (HE) and other background characteristics were investigated. RESULTS: Both the HV on admission (p = 0.031) and final HV (p = 0.001) were larger in patients on warfarin than in those not receiving warfarin. HE occurred more frequently (p < 0.001), and mortality at 30 days or at discharge was higher (p = 0.003) in the warfarin group than in the control group. A multivariate adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that warfarin treatment (OR = 5.75, 95% CI = 2.41-13.8, p < 0.001), liver disease (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.12-5.99, p = 0.026), and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.15, p < 0.001, per 1-score increase) on admission were independently related to HE. CONCLUSIONS: Acute ICH in patients on long-term warfarin treatment appears to be associated with HE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuwashiro et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: