Why the study?
Prompt quantification of reductive-oxidative imbalance could improve cardiovascular risk assessment and management, warranting an evaluation of the prognostic value of d-ROMs for CVD events and mortality.
Does the measurement of derivatives-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) predict cardiovascular disease events and mortality in individuals with known and unknown CVD?
Does the measurement of derivatives-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) predict cardiovascular disease events and mortality in individuals with known and unknown CVD?
d-ROMs represent an emerging oxidative-stress-related biomarker that may improve cardiovascular risk stratification in both primary and secondary prevention.
Oxidative stress participates in the development and exacerbation of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The ability to promptly quantify an imbalance in an individual reductive-oxidative (RedOx) state could improve cardiovascular risk assessment and management. Derivatives-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) are an emerging biomarker of oxidative stress quantifiable in minutes through standard biochemical analysers or by a bedside point-of-care test. The current review evaluates available data on the prognostic value of d-ROMs for CVD events and mortality in individuals with known and unknown CVD. Outcome studies involving small and large cohorts were analysed and hazard ratio, risk ratio, odds ratio, and mean differences were used as measures of effect. High d-ROM plasma levels were found to be an independent predictor of CVD events and mortality. Risk begins increasing at d-ROM levels higher than 340 UCARR and rises considerably above 400 UCARR. Conversely, low d-ROM plasma levels are a good negative predictor for CVD events in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. Moreover, combining d-ROMs with other relevant biomarkers routinely used in clinical practice might support a more precise cardiovascular risk assessment. We conclude that d-ROMs represent an emerging oxidative-stress-related biomarker with the potential for better risk stratification both in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pigazzani et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: